Both-Averse
Gain-Loving, Loss-Averse
Loss-Loving, Gain-Averse
Both-Loving


You're a government official assigned to the emergency response to a dam breaking in California. You have two options for fixing the dam. Under one plan, <b>400 people</b> <i>will</i> <b>die</b>, no matter what. Under the second, there's a 33% chance that <b>0 people </b>will <b>die</b>, but a 66% chance that <b>600 people</b> will die. To recap:<br>Plan 1: 100% chance 400 people will die.<br>Plan 2: 33% chance 0 people will die; 66% chance 600 people will die.

Plan 1		Both-Averse, Gain-Loving/Loss-Averse
Plan 2		Both-Loving, Gain-Averse/Loss-Loving

Once again, you're a government official, assigned to the same type of emergency situation. This time, under one plan, <b>200 people</b> <i>will</i> be saved, no matter what. Under another plan, there's a 33% chance <b>600 people</b> will be saved, but a 66% chance that no one will be saved. To recap:<br>Plan 1: 100% chance 200 people will be saved.<br>Plan 2: 33% chance 600 people will be saved; 66% chance 0 people will be saved.

Plan 1		Both-Averse, Gain-Averse/Loss-Loving
Plan 2		Both-Loving, Gain-Loving/Loss-Averse